Summary of the Second LFIT School Council (CE) held on January 26, 2026

Based on notes taken by parent representatives

Attendees

Parent Representatives: Mrs. Després, Mr. Dumerc, Mrs. Hughes, Mrs. Mahjoubi

School Leadership Staff: Mrs. Campels, Mr. Ragouvin, Mr. Teissonnière, Mr. Jublot, Mr. Dahmane, Mr. Bonnet (Languages Attaché)

Student Representatives: Miss Kiku Grossas, Mr. Haroun Ben Youssef

Councillors for French Citizens Abroad: Mr. Consigny, Mr. Roussel, Mr. Seguela

Summary of Key Agenda Items

Approval of the Minutes from the November 19, 2025 School Council

Mr. Roussel requests two amendments, which are approved.

School Calendar

The calendar had already been voted on in the various councils prior to the School Council meeting:

The calendar is not ideal, particularly during “Silver Week,” but keeping all public holidays during that period would require shortening other holiday breaks.
The calendar was adopted unanimously.

Preparation for the New School Year

For the 2026 school year, LFIT expects 33 primary classes (including 8 kindergarten classes) and 34 secondary classes (one more class than currently)

Curriculum Changes

Combination of Optional classes

Special attention will be given to the accumulation of elective options. The high school may limit the number of options for some students, considering timetable conflicts and the overall workload on students. Students and families will, of course, be informed prior to entry into Première.

Latin in 5ème

Latin will now be offered as an optional subject starting in 5ème (rather than being compulsory as it was previously), in accordance with official regulations. The French department will actively promote the option at the end of 6ème to encourage voluntary enrolment. There will be no impact on teaching positions.

Opening of Specialty or Optional classes

Given current budgetary constraints, particular attention will be paid to enrolment numbers in options and specialty subjects. A case-by-case review will be conducted and if the number of enrolled students is considered insufficient, the specialty class, language class, or optional course may not open for the 2026 school year.

These last two proposals are put to the vote (Latin as an option: 11 in favor, 1 against; Opening groups subject to sufficient enrollment: 7 in favor, 2 against, 3 abstentions)

Miscellaneous questions:

1. Questions from Mr. Roussel (Councillor for French Citizens Abroad)

Response: Usual staffing changes (replacement of departing staff and recruitment of new staff). Ongoing, as further information is provided by personnel.

Response: Several strong applications reviewed. An offer was made to one professional, but availability would only begin in September.
Follow-up: Her conditions could not be accepted. A proposal will be made to a second shortlisted candidate.

Response: Reviewed by CESCE. A late request from 5ème homeroom teachers to experiment with a smartphone break was approved. It will be implemented at that grade level. Communication and purchase of required pouches are underway thanks to a generous donor.

Response: Planting is scheduled along the primary playground fence (CP/CE1). Ongoing reflection on sowing melliferous flowers on the green roof (for the beehive). Regular plantings at the Annex and in kindergarten classes. The school does not own the land; space is limited and additional tree planting would involve costs (gardener, pruning services, etc.).

2. Questions from Mr. Séguéla (Councillor for French Citizens Abroad)

Response: Article L.111-1-1 does not directly apply as a legal obligation to AEFE-affiliated schools abroad, which operate under local law.
However, displaying the 1789 Declaration is consistent with the fundamental principles of French education and the network’s mission. If not already displayed, it will be posted.
The Charter of Secularism is already displayed; the Declaration may be displayed alongside it.
A Japanese translation could become a pedagogical project led by a teacher.

Response: The lycée is not competent to produce such a document. Prevention efforts are coordinated by CESCE with professional interventions.
A parent representative notes that the former handbook provided an opportunity for parents to review rules with their children.

Response: No such request has been made through the continuing education system. Moreover, as formulated, this type of training does not fall within the school’s scope of responsibility.

Response: Document has been communicated.

Response: This meeting has been incorporated into a broader citizenship and addiction-prevention education project within the annual CESCE action plan. Scheduling depends on the availability of external speakers. Work ongoing.

3. Questions from Parent Representatives (Submitted Late)

Post-meeting Response: The objective was to provide additional services (individual photos, printed orders, early delivery) while reducing staff workload.
Charging via tuition fees would be difficult to validate as costs.
A review with the provider concluded that next year higher-resolution digital photos will be offered. Overall, the operation was successful.

Post-meeting Response: Students should contact Japanese higher education institutions directly, which should provide information regarding scholarship procedures during the admissions process.

FLT-Fapee : LFI Tokyo Families Association